17 MLB players exchanged numbers at the January 9th deadline. Spotrac details the results of each case as we conclude the 2025 MLB arbitration period.
RELATED: 2025 Arbitration Tracker
Kyle Tucker (OF, CHC)
Avoided Arbitration; 1 yr / $16,500,000
Player Filed: $17,500,000 / Team Filed: $15,000,000 / Difference: $2,500,000
Tucker was traded to Chicago entering his final year of team control. The two sides commenced their relationship by exchanging salary figures but ultimately avoided arbitration on a one year deal. That’s a rare result in the ‘file and trial’ era as most of these go to a hearing or get settled as extensions. Players and teams have swapped salaries 73 times over the last three seasons with only Tucker and Gleyber Torres agreeing on one year contracts. The gap between these filings was the largest since 2023 when Tucker (with Houston) and Bo Bichette both filed $7.5M against $5M. The Cubs last arbitration hearing was in 2021 when they lost to Ian Happ.
Nathaniel Lowe (1B, TEX)
LOST ARBITRATION HEARING; 1 yr, $10,300,000
Player Filed: $11,100,000 / Team Filed: $10,300,000 / Difference: $800,000
Washington traded for Lowe this offseason and welcomed him with an arbitration hearing which was their first since 2019. That might be unimportant but it could be an early indication of his inevitable free agency in 2027. Either way, Lowe is due for a sizable raise from the $7.5M he took home last season. His 2025 salary ranks 5th highest among first baseman with similar service time behind only Vlad Guerrero Jr., Pete Alonso, Jose Abreu and Chris Davis.
Michael King (SP, SD)
Avoided Arbitration + Mutual option; 1 yr / $7,750,000
2025: $4M ($1M base + $3M signing bonus)
2026: $15M Mutual option ($3.75M buyout)
Player Filed: $8,800,000 / Team Filed: $7,325,000 / Difference: $1,475,000
The unique structure of this saves the Padres some cash in 2025 as they attempt to contend while evening out the payroll. The Mutual option is a technicality so consider this a one year guarantee. King will earn $4M this year ($1M base / $3M signing bonus) and the balance will pay via buyout ($3.75M) once the option is officially declined. It has now been over a decade since the Padres last hearing with Andrew Cashner in 2014.
William Contreras (C, MIL)
Avoided Arbitration + Club option; 1 yr / $6,100,000
2025: $6M
2026: $12M Club option ($100k buyout)
Player Filed: $6,500,000 / Team Filed: $5,600,000 / Difference: $900,000
Contreras is in uncharted arbitration territory at the position. His guarantee is the highest ARB1 (non Super Two) salary for a catcher and 8th including all batters. The Club option value is his 2026 ceiling so Contreras might need a third straight MVP caliber season to make that relevant. Otherwise, Milwaukee won’t hesitate to decline the option and reestablish his value in arbitration as they did with Devin Williams this year.
Luis Rengifo (3B, LAA)
WON Arbitration Hearing: 1 yr / $5,950,000
2025: $5,950,000
2026: UFA
Player Filed: $5,950,000 / Team Filed: $5,800,000 / Difference: $150,000
Rengifo beat the Angels for the second time in three years bringing his arbitration earnings total to $13.65M. He was on pace for multiple career highs (AVG, R, RBI, SB) before a July wrist injury forced season-ending surgery. His shifting role as a super utility almost certainly cost him money throughout the process but we’ll get a better idea of his true value once he hits free agency next offseason.
Jarren Duran (OF, BOS)
Avoided arbitration + Club option; 1 yr / $3,850,000
2025: $3.75M
2026: $8M Club option ($100k buyout)
Player Filed: $4,000,000 / Team Filed: $3,500,000 / Difference: $500,000
His 2025 salary ranks 5th among first year Super Two outfielders behind only Bellinger ($11.5M) Soto ($8.5M) Arozarena ($4.5M) and Springer ($3.9M). It puts Duran on pace for a 2026 arbitration value in the range of $7-9M. The Club option can escalate from $8M to $12M based on MVP voting although a 25-50% increase could inflate the price beyond his ceiling arbitration comps. Boston is basically protected from an outlier season in either direction. They can decline if the option value jumps too much OR Duran underperforms.
Jorge Mateo (SS, BAL)
Avoided arbitration + Club option; 1 yr / $3,550,000
2025: $3.55M
2026: $5.5M Club option ($500k incentives)
Player Filed: $4,000,000 / Team Filed: $3,100,000 / Difference: $900,000
Mateo has stuck on this roster despite the Orioles pipeline of younger talent. It’s evidence they value his versatility (2B,SS,OF) which is hard to replicate at a similar cost. Baltimore also added an extra year of team control which is a similar strategy used last offseason with Ryan O’Hearn who is now back on a Club option. Baltimore had the most eligible players (12) but successfully avoided arbitration with that entire group.
Brendan Donovan (OF, STL)
LOST Arbitration Hearing; 1 yr / $2,850,000
Player Filed: $3,300,000 / Team Filed: $2,850,000 / Difference: $450,000
They received opposite rulings but Donovan will earn just $100k less than teammate Lars Nootbaar. His ARB1 salary slots between previous super utility players Luis Rengifo ($2.3M) and Tommy Edman ($4.2M) which puts Donovan on pace to make around $12M total across the next two seasons. The Cardinals lost their other two cases that went to hearings.
Lars Nootbaar (OF, STL)
WON ARBITRATION HEARING; 1 yr / $2,950,000
Player Filed: $2,950,000 / Team Filed: $2,450,000 / Difference: $500,000
Nootbaar received a fortunate ruling in his first trip through arbitration. He’s productive when he plays but has struggled with injuries through his first four seasons. His ARB1 salary slots just behind outfielders Matt Vierling ($3.005M) and Brandon Marsh ($3M) who avoided arbitration earlier this offseason.
Alex Vesia (RP, LAD)
Avoided arbitration + Club option; 1 yr / 2,300,000
2025: $2.25M
2026: $3.55M Club option ($50k buyout)
Player Filed: $2,350,000 / Team Filed: $2,050,000 / Difference: $300,000
This guarantee is just under their ask but the Club option will cost Vesia his final year of arbitration eligibility. The Dodgers have avoided arbitration with all eligible players for the fifth consecutive season. Their last hearings were with Joc Pederson and Pedro Baez in 2020.
Andre Pallante (SP, STL)
WON ARBITRATION SETTLEMENT; 1 yr, $2,100,000
Player Filed: $2,100,000 / Team Filed: $1,925,000 / Difference: $175,000
This arbitration class had 85 players in their first year of eligibility with 27 of those qualifying for Super Two Status. Pallante was the lone Super Two case that went to an arbitration hearing. His $2.1M salary will fall just below fellow Super Two pitchers Ben Lively ($2.25M) and Bailey Falter ($2.222M) who had previously avoided arbitration.
Mark Leiter Jr. (RP, NYY)
LOST Arbitration Hearing; 1 yr / $2,050,000
Player Filed: $2,500,000 / Team Filed: $2,050,000 / Difference: $450,000
Leiter Jr. (34) was the oldest player to exchange numbers at the deadline. Unfortunately his arbitration earning potential is limited by overall role and usage which translates to more Holds than Saves. This was the Yankees first hearing since Dellin Betances in 2017.
Mickey Moniak (OF, LAA)
WON Arbitration Hearing; $2,000,000
Player Filed: $2,000,000 / Team Filed: $1,500,000 / Difference: $500,000
Moniak won despite a significant step back (79 wRC+) from his breakout 2023 season. The higher starting point in his first year of arbitration might not impact future earnings if he’s limited to a fourth outfielder role this season but it’s a sizable raise nonetheless. The Angels have had at least one arbitration each of the last three seasons.
Dennis Santana (RP, PIT)
LOST Arbitration Hearing; $1,400,000
Player Filed: $2,100,000 / Team Filed: $1,400,000 / Difference: $700,000
Santana was DFA’d by the Yankees after a disastrous start but the Pirates claimed him and a pitch mix change helped unlock a promising second half. But that stretch wasn’t enough to overcome his otherwise inconsistent career and the arbitration panel sided with Pittsburgh. Santana needs to replicate those results over a full season to build a stronger case heading into his final year of arbitration eligibility in 2026.
Taylor Walls (SS, TBR)
Avoided arbitration + Club option; 1 yr / $1,400,000
2025: $1.35M
2026: $2.45M Club option ($50k buyout)
Player Filed: $1,575,000 / Team Filed: $1,300,000 / Difference: $275,000
Walls’ deal correlates with newly acquired free agent Ha-Seong Kim. The former will start 2025 at shortstop while the latter recovers from offseason shoulder surgery but Kim has a 2026 Player option that could affect how the Rays handle their Club option with Walls. Either way he’s under team control through 2027. Tampa Bay had been to six hearings over the prior two seasons but successfully avoided arbitration with this year's group of players.
Jose Quijada (RP, LAA)
Avoided arbitration + Club option; 1 yr / $1,075,000
2025: $1.075M
2026: $3.75M Club option
Player Filed: $1,140,000 / Team Filed: $975,000 / Difference: $165,000
This agreement lands just above the midpoint but gives the Angels control over his final year of arbitration eligibility. That might not matter here considering the price of the 2026 Club option. Quijada missed the start of 2024 recovering from Tommy John surgery but the lefty reliever should serve a more prominent role in 2025.
Johan Oviedo (SP, PIT)
LOST Arbitration Hearing; $850,000
Player Filed: $1,150,000 / Team Filed: $850,000 / Difference: $300,000
Oviedo missed the entire 2024 season (Tommy John surgery) and his 2025 role remains uncertain so this outcome isn’t too surprising. He’s under control for two more years and can reestablish his value with a return to pre-injury form. The Pirates have now won all four of their arbitration hearings since 2015.