Keith SmithMarch 21, 2022

The 2021-22 season was Bradley Beal’s 10th year in the NBA. That’s a milestone in terms of longevity and in terms of contract tiers. For Beal, he’s now eligible for the largest maximum deal possible. But it’s also an important marker for a player whose health concerns were once so real, it was fair to question if he’d make it this far.

In his first four seasons, Beal missed 81 out of a possible 328 games. That’s one full season’s worth of time. Then Beal turned a corner with his health and was mostly available for the next five seasons. Then this year, the wheels came off and Beal will have missed more than half of the season. The good news is that the early injuries for the Washington Wizards scoring guard were filled with lower body injuries. His injury this year was to his left wrist and Beal is expected to make a full recovery. That recovery will come just in time for free agency.

Now, if we take Beal at his word, that free agency should be relatively drama free. The biggest question is probably the length of his next deal. Beal has repeatedly said he has no desire to leave Washington. That’s a sentiment shared by his family on social media. And it’s one the Wizards front office cites on a semi-regular basis. Yet, as it has for years, speculation of Beal skipping town from the capital continues to hover. Recent reports are that the Miami Heat could make a run at Beal in free agency, despite that being a tricky proposition.

At any rate, one thing is certain: Bradley Beal will be a free agent this summer. With that in mind, here are the various contract options for the Wizards franchise player this summer.

 

The Veteran Extension

There are two different ways Bradley Beal could forgo free agency and do an extension with the Washington Wizards, but neither are going to happen. Beal could decline his player option and sign a four-year extension that starts with the 2022-23 season right now. That deal would look like this:

  • 2022-23: $40,469,040
  • 2023-24: $43,706,563
  • 2024-25: $46,944,086
  • 2025-26: $50,181,609
  • Total: Four years, $181,301,298

That’s the 120% max bump Beal can get via a first-year extension, followed by 8% raises after.

Or Beal could exercise that player option for 2022-23 and then add four years on from there. That deal would look like this:

  • 2022-23: $36,422,136 (exercised player option)
  • 2023-24: $43,706,563
  • 2024-25: $47,203,088
  • 2025-26: $50,699,613
  • 2025-26: $54,196,138
  • Total: Five years, $232,227,538

That’s the 120% max bump off the picked-up player option, followed by 8% raises after.

In both of the above scenarios, Beal would be sacrificing a good chunk of first-year salary. Beal’s projected max salary for 2022-23 in Year One of a new contract is $42,350,000. That $2 million-to-$6 million is a big difference immediately and even more so over the life of a long-term deal with 8% raises.

 

Re-signing with the Wizards

If Bradley Beal wants to maximize his next deal, he’ll re-sign with Washington. Because he entered the NBA as a 19-year-old, Beal is only turning 29 at the end of this league year. He’ll start Year One of his fourth NBA contract still in his prime.

That removes the often-tricky barriers of the Over-38 rule that many 10-plus years of service players face in the latter years of long-term deals. Beal will be only 33 years old in the fifth year of a full max deal that would look like this:

  • 2022-23: $42,350,000
  • 2023-24: $45,738,000
  • 2024-25: $49,126,000
  • 2025-26: $52,514,000
  • 2025-26: $55,902,000
  • Total: Five years, $245,630,000

That’s the full 35% of the cap max with 8% raises.

It’s pretty easy to see why Beal won’t be signing an extension. Instead, he’ll opt for a new deal that will pay him upwards of $64.5 million over the life of the deal than he could get by extending. It’s also likely that Beal will be able to get a player option on his final season. That will make him a free agent again for his age-33 season. If he can stay healthy, he could be in line for one more good-sized payday.

 

Signing with Another Team

Let’s be clear here: If Bradley Beal changes teams, it’s going to be for the max. It’s also highly likely to happen via sign-and-trade, as none of the teams with cap space this summer are in a spot where adding Beal makes sense. Nor does it make sense for Beal to sign on with a rebuilding team at this point in his career.

Whether Beal changed team via sign-and-trade or via outright signing, his deal would look the same:

  • 2022-23: $42,350,000
  • 2023-24: $44,467,500
  • 2024-25: $46,585,000
  • 2025-26: $48,702,500
  • Total: Four years, $182,105,000

That’s the 35% of the cap max with 5% raises.

As you can see, that’s a pretty hefty difference in total salary. In total money, it’s about $63.5 million. If we just did a four-year total vs four-year total comparison (assuming Beal gets a player option on Year Five), it’s a $7.6 million total difference. But a player with Beal’s health history isn’t likely to give up on a fifth-year of potential salary.

It’s also fair to assume that if Beal is changing teams, he’ll be able to demand a player option for Year Four. No acquiring team is going to let that stand between them getting Beal or not. And that would put him back on the market as a 32-year-old that could possibly still command another full max deal of four or five years.

 

Summary

Bradley Beal could make waves this summer and kick off somewhat of a chain reaction of change around the NBA. Or he could do what he’s said he’s going to do, and what he’s always done in the past, and stay right home in Washington. If Beal was to change teams, say to long-rumored suitors the Miami Heat, it would have to be via sign-and-trade. That would sap Miami of a lot of their depth. And they’d have an impressive, but older, starting five that’s filled with at least somewhat injury-prone players. If Beal stays with the Wizards, he’ll need a significant commitment from ownership and the front office that they are going to build a winner around him. He said as much in early-March when he commented that the Wizards “know what this summer is”. That begs the question: Is Beal really a guy you feel comfortable with committing five years and over $245 million to?

On one hand, since finding good health in 2016-17, Beal has blossomed. He’s averaged at least 22.6 points per game in each of the last six seasons, and he’s topped out at over 30 points per game twice. Beal’s also been an All-Star in three of the last five seasons. On the other hand, Beal did suffer a relapse in health this season. And this year marked a fourth straight season where his once-deadeye shooting has fallen off. After dropping to around 35% from behind the arc for four years, Beal fell off to just 30% this season. Even more worrisome, his volume of three-point attempts dropped off to 5.3 attempts per game. Most worrisome of all, Beal’s free throw attempts per game have dropped from 8.0 to 7.7 to 5.1 over the last three seasons. That’s often a sign that a player can’t beat the defense and force them to foul the way he once could.

Yet, what choice do the Wizards really have? Beal is still in his prime, still incredibly productive and he’s always wanted to stay home. That’s worth a lot to franchises in an era where guys change teams as often as the cherry blossoms come into bloom. Expect Beal to decline his player option and to sign a five-year max deal with Washington this summer. He’ll probably get a player option on the final season too. Then, if the Wizards are still floundering near the bottom of the Play-In race in a year or two, Beal can ask for a trade to a contender. At that point, no Washington fan can blame him. Beal will have given the Wizards over a decade to figure it out. That’s more than double the patience most stars give a franchise.

Related NBA Contract Option Articles

Tyler Herro Extension Options

Options for Zach LaVine’s Next Contract

The Complicated Case of Zion Williamson’s Next Contract

What The Next Kyrie Irving Contract Could Look Like

A Deep Dive Into Jalen Brunson's Contract Options

The Salary Math Behind the James Harden Situation

Damian Lillards' Demands

Keith SmithMarch 18, 2022

Tyler Herro of the Miami Heat is probably going to win Sixth Man of the Year. Actually, remove the probably. Herro will win Sixth Man of the Year. Herro has been dominant off the bench for Miami this season. He’s averaged 21 points, 4.8 rebounds and 3.8 assists per game for the Heat in his third season. In a somewhat odd twist, Herro has been far more effective as a reserve than as a starter. His efficiency drops considerably as a starter, which leads to fall-off in overall production. That begs the question: How much do you pay a sixth man?

That’s what the Heat have to answer this summer, as Herro becomes extension eligible. Reports are already out there that Herro is seeking a max extension. Can you max out a player who has started in just 33 of 166 games? As a reminder: Herro is under contract for 2022-23 at $5.7 million. If he signs an extension this summer, it would start with the 2023-24 season. We’re using a conservative salary cap projection of $127 million to build our estimates off of.

The Full Max Extension

Let’s cover this first, because it’s what Herro is going to ask for. For a guy who is a proven scorer, good shooter and developing playmaker, it’s fair to start here.

Here’s what the full max extension would look like for Herro:

  • 2023-24: $31,750,000
  • 2024-25: $34,290,000
  • 2025-26: $36,830,000
  • 2026-27: $39,370,000
  • 2027-28: $41,910,000
  • Total: Five years, $184,150,000

This is a five-year extension with 8% raises. It starts at the full projected max of $31,750,000. Player options on the final season have become somewhat common again, after disappearing for years. But they are generally reserved for players who have All-Star or All-NBA selections on their resume. Herro probably isn’t in a spot to command a player option yet.

One other option that’s worth considering, but hard to put figures to, is the idea of a below max extension, but with bonuses that could bring it to a max. This is essentially what the Boston Celtics did in Jaylen Brown’s extension. Brown’s guaranteed money is below the max, but he has performance and team success language that can push his salary up close to max money. That could be a way for Miami and Herro to split the difference, if the Heat aren’t comfortable with a guaranteed max.

 

Playing Things Out to Restricted Free Agency

Let’s say Miami doesn’t want to go to the full max and Herro won’t budge off that ask. They could play things out during the 2022-23 season. In that case, Herro would be eligible for restricted free agency in the summer of 2023.

Nothing would change as far as the deal Miami could offer Herro, as far as the max goes. That number remains the same. What could happen is a down season could knock Herro’s price tag down some. Conversely, if Herro continues to play as he has this season, he’ll be in an even stronger position to demand a max deal.

We’re going to cover this here, because it’s as good a place as any: Herro isn’t a candidate to sign the Qualifying Offer and hit unrestricted free agency in 2024. Herro will likely meet Starter Criteria (via the 2,000 minutes played criterion vs the 41 games started criterion), which will bump his QO just slightly. Instead of $7.9 million, Herro could sign the QO for $8.5 million.

Simply put: Herro is too good to sign for so little. In addition, there are no signs Herro has any sort of adverse relationship with Miami that would cause him to want to leave town so badly that he’d sign the QO.

 

Leaving For Another Team

Let’s say things do go sideways for some reason between Herro and the Heat. He could sign with another team as a restricted free agent. That offer sheet would look like this:

  • 2023-24: $31,750,000
  • 2024-25: $33,337,500
  • 2025-26: $34,925,000
  • 2026-27: $36,512,500
  • Total: Four years, $136,525,000

This is a four-year max deal with 5% raises. Generally, an offer sheet includes all the bells and whistles to entice the incumbent to let the player walk. This deal would likely include a 15% trade bonus, a player option on the fourth season and probably some up front actual payments. The idea is to make it so that it’s as uncomfortable as possible for the incumbent team to match.

Given that Miami’s front office is one of the smarter and more creative in the league, it’s unlikely things would get to this point. If Herro was set on leaving South Beach, the Heat would look to work a sign-and-trade. In that case, the contract for Herro would look exactly the same as above, as players can’t get more via sign-and-trade that via signing outright with a new team.

 

The Extension After a Trade

We’ll cover this one pretty quickly, as it would look exactly like the max extension with Miami would. Trading Herro this offseason seems unlikely, but there is a precedent to look at.

In 2012, after three outstanding seasons off the bench, the Oklahoma City Thunder traded James Harden to the Houston Rockets.

No, we’re not saying Tyler Herro is going to become James Harden. But…we’re not exactly not saying it either. Go compare their first three seasons. We’ll wait… Kind of similar, right?

At any rate, if Miami wanted to cash in, rebuild their young talent and draft pick pipeline, they could look to deal Herro to a team that sees him as their Harden. In that case for Herro, the extension options would look the same as they would with the Heat. And if a team gave up a big package to get Herro, they’d be giving him a max deal.

 

Summary

It’s unlikely Tyler Herro is going anywhere. He’s simply too important to what Miami has built, and just as key, to what the Heat are building moving forward.

Expect Herro and Miami to come to an agreement on a max deal. Whether that’s four or five years, or five years with a player option on the final season, is up in the air. Or it could be a slightly below max, with bonus language to the max.

Given his status as the top sixth man in the league, age, continued improvement and importance to the Heat, Herro will probably get maxed out.

And that’s when things get really interesting for Miami.

If Herro gets a max that starts with the 2023-24 season, the Heat will have the following players under contract for that season:

That’s $156.6 million against a projected luxury tax line of $154.4 million for five players. $2.2 million over the tax for five players.

For five players! That’s a minimum of nine roster spots to fill. Re-sign a couple of their own free agents and the Heat start pushing into Nets, Warriors, Clippers and Lakers levels of tax bills.

At the trade deadline, Miami not-so-subtly shopped Duncan Robinson. Part of that is Robinson is in the midst of a third straight season of declining production. And that’s attached to $74.4 million owed to the sharpshooter through 2025-26.

But a just-as-big a part of shopping Robinson is related to future roster planning. You can’t be over the tax line for just five players. Especially when two of the five players will be 34 years old (Butler) and 36 years old (Lowry), with lengthy injury histories. Look at this season’s Lakers for how precarious building that top-heavy of a roster becomes.

Miami is smart. They also know they have a full season and two offseasons to figure things out. They’ll likely lock Herro up to an extension, and probably one that approaches the max. But the Heat will make roster tweaks before Herro’s extension kicks in. It’ll probably cost them Robinson, but that’s the price of doing business when you’ve nailed your draft picks and end-of-roster signings like Miami has.

 

Related NBA Contract Option Articles

Options for Zach LaVine’s Next Contract

The Complicated Case of Zion Williamson’s Next Contract

What The Next Kyrie Irving Contract Could Look Like

A Deep Dive Into Jalen Brunson's Contract Options

The Salary Math Behind the James Harden Situation

Damian Lillards' Demands

Keith SmithMarch 14, 2022

UPDATED 4/29 PER A PROJECTED $122M 2022-23 LEAGUE CAP

In the summer of 2018, Zach LaVine signed a four-year, $78 million offer sheet with the Sacramento Kings. The offer sheet was structured with no options and was worth a flat $19.5 million per season. It seems silly now, but there was real debate at the time as to whether the Chicago Bulls should match. Chicago did match. And they made the right decision as LaVine’s career has taken off since then. Why then were there questions about if Chicago could match? LaVine had played for only poor teams in his career, having spent the first three seasons of his career with the Minnesota Timberwolves and the fourth year with the Bulls. In addition, LaVine had some injuries issues in his third and fourth seasons.

Still, he was seen as a talented player. One who could both handle the ball as a playmaker, but also function as a primary scorer, even if that was still somewhat theoretical at the time. In the first four years of his career, LaVine averaged 14 points, three rebounds and 3.2 assists per game. His first year in Chicago, after being acquired in the trade that sent Jimmy Butler to the Wolves, featured just 24 games. LaVine debuted in mid-January after tearing his ACL in his last with year the Wolves. He was up-and-down until he was shut down for the year in mid-March. In the four years since the Bulls matched the offer sheet from the Kings, LaVine’s career went to the next level. He’s averaged 25.3 points, 4.8 rebounds and 4.5 assists per game. In addition, LaVine has had 48/39/83 shooting splits during that period.

Just as importantly, LaVine has stayed mostly healthy during this run. That has helped him garner back-to-back All-Star nods. In addition, LaVine has shown he’s not just a “good stats, bad team” guy, as he’s been a big part of Chicago’s turnaround. This summer, LaVine will again hit free agency. The difference is this time he’ll be an unrestricted free agent. And the Bulls won’t get him on any sort of under-market, team-friendly deal. LaVine is likely to get paid.

Here are the options for Zach LaVine’s next contract.

 

The Veteran Extension

We can rule this one out, but for the sake of completionism, we’re going to cover it.

LaVine and Chicago could ink a veteran extension right now. The challenge is that it won’t pay LaVine nearly enough. He’d be limited to 120% of his current salary in the first year of an extension that would start in 2022-23. LaVine could then get 8% raises on the three subsequent seasons. That deal would look like this:

  • 2022-23: $23,400,000
  • 2023-24: $25,272,000
  • 2024-25: $27,144,000
  • 2025-26: $29,016,000
  • Total: Four years, $104,832,000

It should be pretty easy to see why this one isn’t happening. That’s not even the maximum a player can get coming off a Rookie Scale contract. More simply put: players hitting free agency after an All-Star season command far more than an average of $26 million per season.

 

The Standard Max with the Bulls

Now, we’re talking! This is probably where the conversation starts for LaVine and Chicago. He just recently turned 27 years old, so LaVine should maintain his value throughout the life of this deal. Here’s what the full max would look like:

  • 2022-23: $36,600,000
  • 2023-24: $39,528,000
  • 2024-25: $42,456,000
  • 2025-26: $45,384,000
  • 2026-27: $48,312,000
  • Total: Five years, $212,280,000

That’s the full five-year max, with 8% raises. It starts at the 30% of the salary cap max, based on the most recent projection of a $122 million salary cap for 2022-23.

It’s likely this deal would include a player option for LaVine on the final season. Most players of his caliber have been able to get a player option on a max deal. That would allow LaVine to get back on the free agent market for one more big contract when he’s 31 years old.

 

The Full Max with Another Team

Let’s say the Bulls playoff run doesn’t go as hoped for and Chicago is bounced in the first round. Maybe LaVine doesn’t mesh with DeMar DeRozan and Nikola Vucevic on the biggest stage. Maybe he wants a bigger role on his own team elsewhere.

Even if the Bulls falter earlier than some might expect in the postseason, LaVine will have been a huge part of that turnaround. He’s probably not leaving Chicago in that case. But, just in case, here’s what a max deal with another team would look like:

  • 2022-23: $36,600,000
  • 2023-24: $38,430,000
  • 2024-25: $40,260,000
  • 2025-26: $42,090,000
  • Total: Four years, $157,380,000

That’s the full four-year max LaVine could sign for with another team. It starts at the same 30% of the salary cap max that he can get from the Bulls, but it includes just 5% raises.

In total, that’s about a $6.6 million difference in salary over four years. It’s a $54.5 million difference in total salary. But, given LaVine’s relatively young age, the four-year difference is the one to focus on.

Again, given LaVine’s stature as a two-time All-Star, it’s likely he could demand a player option on the fourth season. That would put him back on the market as a 30-year-old.

One last note on this one: This is the same deal LaVine could get via a sign-and-trade this summer.

 

The Designated Veteran Max with the Bulls

This deal is unlikely to be available to LaVine, but isn’t completely out of the running. LaVine won’t win MVP or Defensive Player of the Year to qualify for a Designated Veteran contract. But he could still make a late push to make an All-NBA team. If that happened, LaVine would qualify to jump from the 30% of the cap max tier to the 35% of the cap max tier, despite having only eight years of service.

A couple of things to note: LaVine is only eligible for this deal this offseason. And he’s only eligible to get it from the Bulls because Chicago acquired him while he was still on his Rookie Scale deal.

Here’s what this contract would look like:

  • 2022-23: $42,700,000
  • 2023-24: $46,116,000
  • 2024-25: $49,532,000
  • 2025-26: $52,948,000
  • 2026-27: $56,364,000
  • Total: Five years, $247,660,000

That’s the full Designated Veteran max starting at 35% of the cap, with 8% raises. As with the other options presented here, LaVine would likely demand a player option on that final season. And he would be in an even better spot to demand one coming off an All-NBA nod.

 

Summary

It seems unlikely that Zach LaVine will make an All-NBA team this season. He’s had a good year, but the Bulls slide in the standings, combined with LaVine missing 13 games as of this writing, probably takes that off the table.

It’s also fair to eliminated the standard veteran extension. He’s not taking that small of a contract.

That leaves the five-year max with Chicago, the four-year max with another team, or something in between.

The guess here is that LaVine take the full five-year max with the Bulls. There are a few reasons for this line of thinking.

First, LaVine has had some health issues, including a reoccurrence of knee pain this season. Most players in that situation want to lock up as much guaranteed money as possible.

Second, LaVine has almost all the leverage here. The Bulls can’t possibly replace him if he leaves. Even if it was a sign-and-trade, it’s unlikely Chicago gets back a player as good as LaVine.

Third, the Bulls are set up to win now. DeMar DeRozan and Nikola Vucevic are win-now players. Chicago has to keep LaVine to keep things moving onward and upward.

Lastly, even if LaVine falters some health-wise, his play should remain solid enough that he’ll retain trade value throughout the life of a five-year max deal. That alone should be enough protection for Chicago.

Even with factoring in a $36.6 million deal for LaVine in 2022-23, the Bulls should still be about $11 million clear of the luxury tax with four roster spots to fill. That should give them the ability to use their full Non-Taxpayer Mid-Level Exception to attract a solid free agent and still dodge the tax. It’ll take a salary-clearing trade or two, but that’s no big deal. Given the lack of spending power around the NBA this summer, the MLE will be worth more than usual in free agency, as cap space dries up before good players have all found homes.

LaVine’s going to get his max deal. And he’s likely going to get it from the Bulls. There’s nothing team-friendly coming this time around, but Chicago should still be in a good spot to build a contender around LaVine, DeRozan, Vucevic and Lonzo Ball for the next few seasons

 

 

Related NBA Contract Option Articles

The Complicated Case of Zion Williamson’s Next Contract

What The Next Kyrie Irving Contract Could Look Like

A Deep Dive Into Jalen Brunson's Contract Options

The Salary Math Behind the James Harden Situation

Damian Lillards' Demands

Keith SmithMarch 07, 2022

UPDATED 4/29 PER A PROJECTED $128.1M 2023-24 LEAGUE CAP

Zion Williamson has finally made his way back to New Orleans for the next phase of his rehab. Williamson has missed the entire season due to a fracture in his right foot. Williamson spent several months rehabbing away from the team in Portland. Now, he’s back in New Orleans, but there’s still no timetable for his return.

At best, it seems like Williamson might play in 10 or so games this season. And that’s at best. If the uber-talented third-year forward doesn’t appear in games this year, he’ll have played in a grand total of 85 games over his first three seasons. 85 games. Or just three more games than one standard NBA season. And thus come the complications with Williamson’s next contract. All signs point to Williamson wanting a full max deal. The Pelicans may be reluctant to go there. Again, 85 total games. In three years!

What we’re going to do here is break down a few different options for Williamson and the Pelicans, as well as Williamson’s options if New Orleans were to trade him.

One note: Williamson has one year left on his rookie scale deal. He’s under contract to the Pelicans for $13,534,817 for 2022-23. Any new deals we are talking about here would start with the 2023-24 season. 

 

The Full Max

We’ve harped on the 85 games a bit, but those 85 games were pretty great. Williamson averaged 25.7 points, 7.0 rebounds and 3.2 assists in those appearances. He’s been borderline dominant as an offensive player whenever we’ve seen him. If the health wasn’t a question, the Pelicans would likely give him a full max extension, without a question. Here’s what that would look like:

  • 2023-24: $32,025,000
  • 2024-25: $34,587,000
  • 2025-26: $37,149,000
  • 2026-27: $39,711,000
  • 2027-28: $42,273,000
  • Total: Five years, $185,745,000

    (based on a $128.1M 23-24 league cap)

This is a five-year extension with 8% raises. It starts at the full projected max of $32,025,000. This is the so-called “standard” max extension that the best players sign coming off their rookie scale contracts. The very best can also command a player option on that fifth season, a la Jayson Tatum and Donovan Mitchell on their current contracts.

 

The Full Max with “Embiid Protections”

We’re not going to re-do the math here, because the contract would be the same as above, but with some important non-guaranteed money.

Back in 2017, Joel Embiid signed one of the more unique max extensions in NBA history. The Philadelphia 76ers and Embiid agreed to a deal with prior injury protections. If Embiid suffered a relapse with foot or back injuries, which had sidelined him during his first few seasons, the Sixers were able to waive him and get out of the max deal with minimal guaranteed money owed to Embiid before each of the final four seasons of the extension.

The key was that Embiid had to miss 25 games or play fewer than 1,650 minutes in the prior season. If that was the case, Philadelphia could waive him and get out of paying the remaining years of his contact.

Obviously, the above never happened and Embiid blossomed into one of the NBA’s most dominant players. He’s even gone on to sign a second max extension. But the 76ers were protected if things went sideways.

Could New Orleans and Williamson come to an agreement on something similar? It’s possible. They could put in protections for foot or knee injuries, both of which Williamson has had since coming to the NBA. But Embiid’s former deal remains unmatched since he signed it. It’s not just rare, it’s completely unique.

One other factor to consider: Embiid signed that extension with that specific language, because he and the 76ers had a great working relationship from the time he was drafted. Williamson and the Pelicans haven’t been in that spot. That alone could be enough to take this option off the table.

 

The Designated Player Rookie Extension

Another extension option for Williamson and the Pelicans is to sign an extension with Designated Player language. This is the type of extension that Luka Doncic and Trae Young both signed last offseason and will have kick in for the 2022-23 season.

Essentially, if Williamson comes back and has a monster 2022-23 season, he can qualify to jump from the 0-6 Years of Service/25% of the cap tier to the 7-9 Years of Service/30% of the cap tier. That deal would look like this:

  • 2023-24: $38,430,000
  • 2024-25: $41,504,400
  • 2025-26: $44,578,800
  • 2026-27: $47,653,200
  • 2027-28: $50,727,600
  • Total: Five years, $222,894,000

    (based on a $128.1M 23-24 league cap)

In order to qualify for the Designated Player Rookie Extension, Williamson would have to accomplish one of the following in 2022-23:

  • Win MVP
  • Win Defensive Player of the Year
  • Make an All-NBA Team. This can be First, Second or Third Team.

It’s probably safe to take the first two out of the mix. But it’s not crazy to think Williamson could make an All-NBA team. Again, in a mostly-healthy 2020-21 season, he put up 27/7/4 on 61% shooting. Those are All-NBA type of numbers, especially if the Pelicans make the jump to being a playoff team.

The better question is: Would New Orleans even offer this? This is riskier than a standard max deal because of the roughly $36.8 million more in total salary over the life of the deal. What if Williamson had exactly one healthy, dominant season and then went right back to being injured on a regular basis? Talk about an albatross on your cap sheet.

 

The Extension After a Trade

Here’s where things get kind of interesting. There’s been extensive reporting that Williamson isn’t exactly happy in New Orleans. If the Pelicans can find a team willing to gamble that they can get him happy and healthy, they could cash in and trade Williamson before signing any sort of extension.

In this case, Williamson would still be eligible to sign any of the extension possibilities laid out above. This includes the Designated Player Rookie Extension. As long as a team acquires a player while they are still on their Rookie Scale contract, they inherit the ability to sign that player to a Designated Player extension.

Something else to keep in mind: It’s likely that Williamson is traded before he signs an extension OR that he’s traded after the extension kicks in with the 2023-24 season. Signing an extension this summer, then trading Williamson at any time during the 2022-23 would come with the “Poison Pill” challenge.

Since a player signed to a Designated Player extension can’t be traded for one year, we’ll use the standard full max extension as our example here.

Because Williamson would have a pending extension on the books, he’d count for his 2022-23 salary of $13,534,817 as outgoing salary for the Pelicans. For the acquiring team, Williamson would count for the average salary of all of the years he’s under contract. In this case, that would be $32,947,470.

That $19.4 million difference makes putting a trade together nearly impossible. Once the league year flips over to 2023-24, Williamson would count for his actual salary of $31,750,000 for both sides of a trade. And, of course, if he’s traded before an extension is signed, Williamson counts for the $13,534,817 salary on both sides.

 

Playing Things Out to Restricted Free Agency

There are two ways this could go. The first is fairly simple. The Pelicans and Williamson don’t reach agreement on an extension this offseason and he ends up set for restricted free agency in 2023-24. Nothing changes as far as the contracts the Pelicans can offer him, minus the ability to offer a Designated Player Rookie Extension. Because it would be a new contract, New Orleans can’t do the extension. However, if Williamson met the criteria, he would still qualify for the so-called “Rose Rule” and it would essentially be the same deal as the Designated Player Rookie Extension, in terms of salary and years.

And, as always, the Pelicans could offer him a standard full max contract, or an amount less than that.

Second, Williamson could sign an offer sheet with another team and force the Pelicans to either match it or let him walk. That offer sheet projects to look like this:

  • 2023-24: $32,025,000
  • 2024-25: $33,626,250
  • 2025-26: $35,227,500
  • 2026-27: $36,828,750
  • Total: Four years, $137,707,500

This is a four-year max deal with 5% raises. Generally, an offer sheet includes all the bells and whistles to entice the incumbent to let the player walk. This deal would likely include a 15% trade bonus, a player option on the fourth season and probably some up front actual payments. The idea is to make it so that it’s as uncomfortable as possible for the incumbent team to match.

 

Signing the Qualifying Offer

This would be unprecedented for a player of Williamson’s stature. No first overall pick has gone this route. Either they’re such a bust that the team holding their free agent rights is ready to move on, or, more commonly, the player is good enough to get a shiny new deal.

It’s been mentioned that eventually some top pick is going to want to change teams badly enough that they won’t sign an extension, nor test the offer sheet process. In that case, the thinking is that player will simply sign their qualifying offer (a one-year contract for a pre-set amount) and then become an unrestricted free agent the following season.

For Williamson, his qualifying offer currently projects to be $17,595,263. If he signed that qualifying offer, he’d play the 2023-24 season for the Pelicans and then become an unrestricted free agent in the summer of 2024.

However, there is a very important caveat in Williamson’s case. In order to get that $17.6 million Qualifying Offer, he’d have to meet Starter Criteria. That means in 2022-23 (assuming he does not play at all this season), Williamson would have to start either 41 games or play at least 2,000 minutes. Given that he’s played a total of 85 games in three season and topped out at just 2,026 minutes in his one healthy season, there’s a risk Williamson won’t meet Starter Criteria.

If Williamson fails to meet Starter Criteria, his Qualifying Offer would drop to an amount equal to the 15th pick of his 2019 draft class. (This was Sekou Doumbouya for those that are curious!) In that case, Williamson’s Qualifying Offer would drop to $7,744,600.

Signing the $17.6 million Qualifying Offer is risky enough that it’s unlikely. Signing one for nearly $10 million less would never happen. And it’s important to note that the Pelicans had even a whiff that Williamson might be looking at going the qualifying offer route, they control his starts and playing time. Teams have been known to hold players out, bring them off the bench or reduce their playing time in order to keep Qualifying Offers at a lower amount.

 

Summary

Zion Williamson’s pending extension talks may be the most fascinating in NBA history. Between his health issues, uneasy relationship with the New Orleans Pelicans and the current trend of players signing extensions and asking for a trade later, this could be a precedent-setting deal.

There are a few priors to consider here. We already covered Joel Embiid. The Sixers center had played in just 31 games when he signed his extension. Those 31 games were terrific, but the injury history gave us the most complicated maximum extension in NBA history. And that type of extension hasn’t been seen since.

A couple of years later, Ben Simmons signed a five-year, maximum extension despite having missed his rookie season. But he had appeared in 81 and 79 games in years two and three of his career. Not exactly the same territory as Williamson.

Markelle Fultz might be the closest comp we have for Williamson. He played in just 33 total games in his first two seasons with the 76ers. He was then traded to the Orlando Magic and played in 72 games in his third year. But given his injury history, and related relative lack of development, Fultz signed a three-year, $50 million extension. And that includes only $2 million in guaranteed money on the final season. It’s hard to imagine Williamson accepting an extension that small.

The other “sort of, but not exactly” player who can work as a comparison is Kristaps Porzingis. He had played in considerably more games than Williamson by the time he was extension eligible, but Porzingis was traded to the Dallas Mavericks while recovering from a torn ACL suffered in his third season. Even though Porzingis missed the entirety of his fourth season, he still signed a full five-year, max deal with the Mavs as a restricted free agent.

There really isn’t a great comp here. Embiid seems safest, but he and the 76ers were already inexorably linked through “The Process” by the time he inked his team-protected extension. There was none of the tension that Williamson and the Pelicans reportedly have.

Usually, we finish these pieces with a projection of what the next deal might look like. In this case, it’s truly impossible. We can comfortably rule out Williamson signing the Qualifying Offer. Given the health issues, it’s hard to believe Williamson will play enough next season to make an All-NBA team and qualify for the Designated Player Rookie Extension. So, we can probably rule that out too.

That leaves either a standard max (which could include the Designated Player language, just in case Williamson breaks out) or playing things out to restricted free agent.

It’s also possible things go the Kristaps Porzingis route. The Knicks were worried Porzingis would never get, and stay, healthy. They simply cut ties and traded him, as opposed to tethering their future to an injury-prone big man. The Pelicans could do the same. And they could do it early enough to leave Williamson time to ink an extension with an acquiring team. Or they could skip the extension and trade Williamson in-season, and let his new team handle his restricted free agency and a new contract as they see fit.

Anyone who tells you they know how this will go down either has a crystal ball, or is simply guessing. Zion Williamson’s next deal, or maybe even lack thereof, will be debated endlessly, because it is truly one of the most complicated contract cases in NBA history.

 

Related NBA Contract Option Articles

What The Next Kyrie Irving Contract Could Look Like

A Deep Dive Into Jalen Brunson's Contract Options

The Salary Math Behind the James Harden Situation

Damian Lillards' Demands

Keith SmithFebruary 28, 2022

It appears New York City is moving close to lifting the vaccine mandates that have kept Kyrie Irving from playing in home games for the Brooklyn Nets this season. That potentially removes an immediate concern of Irving’s availability for postseason home games for the Nets. But just as big of a concern looms this offseason.

Irving has a $36.9 million player option for the 2022-23 season, as the final year of the four-year deal he signed with Brooklyn in the summer of 2019. The most likely course of action is that Irving will decline that option and become an unrestricted free agent. But whatever you think is most likely to happen and Kyrie Irving don’t always go hand in hand.

With that in mind, here are all the reasonable contract options for Irving this summer.

 

The Opt-In

The most simple and straightforward thing Irving could do is to opt in for the 2022-23 season. That would put him on the Brooklyn books for $36,934,550. He would then be an unrestricted free agent with full Bird rights in the summer of 2023.

This is the least likely path Irving will take for a couple of different reasons. First, Irving has had some serious health issues over the years. He’s had two occurrences of serious knee injuries, and he’s battled other ailments as well. He’s also turning 30 years old at the end of March, which still remains an age barrier that often comes with a drop in production for guards.

Second, Irving would be leaving considerably money on the table by picking up his option. Whether with the Nets, or another team, he can get over $5 million more in just 2022-23 salary alone. Factor in raises and additional years of salary, and it would be a shock to see Irving opt in for next season.

 

The Veteran Extension

This scenario is plausible, but not overly likely. Simply because Irving would be leaving a year on the table in this type of extension. Now, that may not be of the biggest concern, as Irving may not push for the full five years he could get in a new deal, but he would be limited to four years in an extension.

It’s important to note that there are three ways Irving could do this type of extension. He could opt out for 2022-23 now and sign a four-year extension starting next season. Or Irving could opt in for 2022-23 and sign a three-year extension. Or he could opt in after this season and then add four years on to that.

The latter two scenarios would both cost Irving money in 2022-23, and thus over the life of the extension, so we’re not even going to bother covering them. But the first scenario is still semi-plausible. Here’s what the numbers would look like:

  • 2022-23: $42,350,000
  • 2023-24: $45,738,000
  • 2024-25: $49,126,000
  • 2025-26: $52,514,000
  • Total: Four years, $189,728,000

This is a four-year extension with 8% raises. What’s interesting is that Irving would technically sign for 120% of his current $35.3 million salary, but that amount would take him just a hair above his projected max salary of $42,350,000 for 2022-23. In that case, his salary would get amended down to the maximum allowable for next season.

For what it’s worth, this extension would be for the exact same amount Irving could sign for in a four-year deal with Brooklyn. But we’ll come back to that later.

 

The Full Max with the Nets

If Irving is happy in Brooklyn, and the Nets are happy with Irving, they can go the full five-year max deal for the veteran point guard. In that scenario, Irving would opt out for 2022-23 and sign a new, five-year deal. The first four years would look the same as above, but a fifth year would get tacked on, making the deal look like this:

  • 2022-23: $42,350,000
  • 2023-24: $45,738,000
  • 2024-25: $49,126,000
  • 2025-26: $52,514,000
  • 2026-27: $55,902,000
  • Total: Five years, $245,630,000

This is a five-year deal with 8% raises. As Irving now has 10 years of service, this is the absolute maximum he can command in a new contract. The key is that he can only get a fifth season, plus the 8% raises from the Nets.

 

The Full Max with Another Team

It seems highly unlikely Irving will leave Brooklyn. He wanted to go there and he recruited Kevin Durant to team up with him on the Nets. The team also seems positioned to be a title contender for at least the next few seasons, assuming Durant and Irving stick around and stay healthy.

But…this is Kyrie Irving we’re talking about. He’s a pretty unpredictable guy. Let’s say he’s not really happy in Brooklyn. Or let’s say some form of the vaccine mandate sticks around or seems likely to come back. In either of those scenarios, maybe Irving looks to head elsewhere.

If that happens, Irving could either sign with a team via cap space or he could move via sign-and-trade. This summer, no teams project to have enough cap space to sign Irving directly. A couple can get within the range necessary, so the idea isn’t entirely off the table. But if Irving is leaving Brooklyn, it would most likely occur via sign-and-trade. The good news is, for our purposes here, the contract would be the exact same either way:

  • 2022-23: $42,350,000
  • 2023-24: $44,467,500
  • 2024-25: $46,585,000
  • 2025-26: $48,702,500
  • Total: Four years, $182,105,000

That’s a four-year deal with 5% raises, which is the max Irving can get from another team, either straight signing via cap space or via sign-and-trade. The first-year money is the same, but over the life of the deal Irving would sacrifice considerable money. He’d forfeit over $7.6 million from the extension or four-year max scenario. And Irving would give up over $63.5 million compared to signing the five-year max with the Nets.

 

Summary

Kyrie Irving is different from most basketball players. He does his own thing, almost without concern for public opinion. He famously (or infamously in New England) told the crowd at TD Garden that he’d be re-signing with the Boston Celtics if they’d have him. Eight months or so later, Irving signed with Brooklyn.

This season, despite pressure from all corners of the NBA world, including from some folks with the Nets, Irving held firm in his beliefs and did not get vaccinated. It’s cost him considerable money, as well missing approximately two-thirds of Brooklyn’s games.

But Kyrie Irving isn’t crazy. He certainly does his own thing, and he’s never been one who is solely financially driven. If so, he wouldn’t have left Boston for Brooklyn while leaving considerable money on the table. And he certainly wouldn’t have sat out most of this season if he made all his decisions based on finances.

But Irving still has taken a pretty big financial hit this year. Combine that with his ostensible happiness to play with Kevin Durant in Brooklyn, and it’s unlikely he’s going anywhere. The most likely path is that Irving signs either a straight four-year deal, or a five-year deal with a player option on the final season, for the maximum. That will allow him to align his tenure with the Nets with Durant, as both could hit free agency again in the summer of 2026. At that point, Irving will be 34 years old, while Durant will be turning 38 prior to the 2026-27 season.

NBA players are playing longer and longer, and at higher levels, than ever before. It’s not a lock that Irving and/or Durant would be retiring before another contract 2026. But it is likely that Irving’s next contract will align with Durant’s to at least set them up to make that decision together.

 

Related NBA Contract Option Articles

A Deep Dive Into Jalen Brunson's Contract Options

The Salary Math Behind the James Harden Situation

Damian Lillards' Demands

Keith SmithFebruary 21, 2022

At the trade deadline, the Dallas Mavericks shed themselves of Kristaps Porzingis’ salary, but replaced it with two salaries of total similar value in Spencer Dinwiddie and Davis Bertans. Those two deals, combined with Luka Doncic’s Designated Rookie Extension, Dorian Finney-Smith’s recent veteran extension and other salary obligations have the Mavs set up to be in “luxury tax hell” per Mark Cuban.

Despite having nearly $137 million committed to their 2022-23 roster, Cuban says the Mavericks intend to do “whatever we have to” to keep guard Jalen Brunson. This seems to be true even if that guaranteed salary figure grows to over $151.5 million, pending roster decisions for Trey Burke, Maxi Kleber and Frank Ntilikina.

For reference purposes: This season the Golden State Warriors have a guaranteed salary amount of grater than $175.8 million, while the Brooklyn Nets are carrying more than $168.8 million. Factoring in a re-signed Brunson, and the Mavs will be in range of the priciest rosters in NBA history.

But before we get there, let’s examine what Brunson’s options for his next contract are. He’s got a handful of ways he can go, either before this season ends or this summer.

 

Veteran Extension

If Brunson and the Mavs wanted to, he could sign a veteran extension today. This type of extension goes by many nicknames, but for our purposes here, we’ll call it “The Dinwiddie” in honor of Brunson’s now teammate, Spencer Dinwiddie.

Because Dallas has full Bird rights for Brunson, but because his current salary is under the estimated average salary ($10,335,000), he can sign an extension with a pretty healthy raise. As a point of order, this is exactly what teammate Dorian Finney-Smith just did when he signed his version of “The Dinwiddie”.

This type of extension allows for Brunson to sign for 120% of the estimated average salary, then to get 8% raises on top of that first-year salary.

Here’s how it would look salary-wise:

  • 2022-23: $12,402,000
  • 2023-24: $13,394,160
  • 2024-25: $14,386,320
  • 2025-26: $15,378,480
  • Total: Four years, $55,560,960

In Finney-Smith’s case, he got a player option on his final season and he also got a 5% trade bonus in his extension.

Now, this deal worked for Finney-Smith, as it worked for Dinwiddie and others. But those who signed this type of extension weren’t quite at Brunson’s level as a player. Dinwiddie is a good comp for Brunson, as both are somewhat similar as score-first point guards, who have been solid secondary-playmakers.

When Dinwiddie signed his extension, he was in the midst of a season that saw him average 16.8 points and 4.6 assists per game. This was after a breakout season with the Brooklyn Nets, where Dinwiddie averaged 12.6 points and 6.6 assists per game, but on 39% shooting from the field, including 33% from behind the arc. In addition, Dinwiddie had a prior injury history to consider, as he had previously torn his ACL.

This year, Brunson is averaging 16.3 points and 5.4 assists. Last season, Brunson averaged 12.6 points and 3.5 assists. But he’s a far better shooter than Dinwiddie, as he hits 49% from the field and 37% from three for his career. Also, there are no serious injury concerns with Brunson either.

Add it all up, and Dallas got one potential bargain with Finney-Smith on “The Dinwiddie”. They won’t get another one with Brunson, as he’d be leaving too much money on the table.

 

The Max Deal With Dallas

Let’s preface this by saying that Jalen Brunson isn’t a max player. Barring a massive playoff run where’s he’s a huge part of leading the Mavericks to the NBA Finals, Brunson won’t approach max money. But, for posterity’s sake, here’s the projected max deal Brunson could ink with Dallas this summer:

  • 2022-23: $30,250,000
  • 2023-24: $32,670,000
  • 2024-25: $35,090,000
  • 2025-26: $37,510,000
  • 2026-27: $39,930,000
  • Total: Five years, $175,450,000

That’s the 0-6 Years of Service five-year contract, max contract. It starts out at the first-year max with 8% raises.

Yes, that’s too rich for Dallas. Signing Brunson to such a deal would put the Mavericks in range of the Golden State Warriors payroll for this year. That’s too much for a team that has yet to advance out of the first round with this core group of players.

 

The Max Deal With Another Team

Could Brunson leave Dallas for a max deal somewhere else? It’s possible. The challenge is that only a handful of teams project to be in range of offering Brunson a max deal this summer. But there are always ways of clearing salary and, of course, sign-and-trades.

If, say the Detroit Pistons decide Brunson is the guy they need next to Cade Cunningham, they can do a max deal for Brunson. If the New York Knicks, one of Brunson’s long-rumored suitors, were willing to give him a max deal, they could arrange a sign-and-trade to send a couple of contracts back to the Mavericks. Or they could rope in a third team to help facilitate a deal.

If Brunson were to change teams on a max deal via straight signing or via sign-and-trade, here’s what that projected max contract would look like:

  • 2022-23: $30,250,000
  • 2023-24: $31,762,500
  • 2024-25: $33,275,000
  • 2025-26: $34,787,500
  • Total: Four years, $130,075,000

That’s the same starting maximum starting salary Brunson could get from the Mavericks, but with only 5% raises in the subsequent seasons.

It’s likely that’s too rich for another team. Again, Brunson is a really solid player, but he hasn’t shown he’s a maximum player. Nor has Brunson shown he can be the number one option on a playoff team, which a max player should be.

 

Finding Middle Ground

This is where things get interesting. There’s about $18 million in wiggle room between “The Dinwiddie” extension Brunson can sign and the maximum amount Brunson can get as a free agent.

And almost right in the middle is the sweet spot for Brunson.

Looking at the teams who have a need at point guard this summer, combined with the Mavs desire to keep Brunson, you can start to formulate what it’ll take to pull him away from Dallas. Or for the Mavericks to re-sign him long-term.

Given that Detroit (via cap space) or New York (via sign-and-trade) could both easily do deals averaging $20 million or so, that seems to be the baseline for Brunson. Something in the four-year, $80 million range seems fair for both player and team.

For Dallas, that type of deal could look something like:

  • 2022-23: $18,000,000
  • 2023-24: $19,440,000
  • 2024-25: $20,880,000
  • 2025-26: $22,320,000
  • Total: Four years, $80,640,000

For Detroit or New York (or anyone else), to get to similar total money, they’d have to up the first-year salary by a bit. That would leave them looking at deal similar to:

  • 2022-23: $18,800,000
  • 2023-24: $19,740,000
  • 2024-25: $20,680,000
  • 2025-26: $21,620,000
  • Total: Four years, $80,840,000

Given Brunson’s age, production and projections to continue to be a solid player through his late-20s, those deal structures seem fair for both player and team. Now, if Detroit or New York (or anyone else) wanted to pull Brunson away, they could always go a little bit higher with their offer.

For the Pistons especially, given their potential cap space, this summer is bereft of quality free agents. If they want to spend some of their projected $31.4 million on a long-term point guard option to grow with Cade Cunningham and their young roster, they’d do worse than starting Brunson out at something even as high as $21 million in first-year salary. That total deal would look like:

  • 2022-23: $21,000,000
  • 2023-24: $22,050,000
  • 2024-25: $23,100,000
  • 2025-26: $24,150,000
  • Total: Four years, $90,300,000

Yes, that might seem a touch high, but to get players to change teams, especially to a rebuilding one, sometimes you need to up your offer. Given the cap is projected to continue to rise, $23 million and $24 million doesn’t seem too extravagant for a solid point guard, who will be entering his prime years in 2024-25 and 2025-26.

 

Summary

Jalen Brunson is going to get paid this summer. The Dallas Mavericks won’t get him on a steal of a deal via “The Dinwiddie” extension, but they won’t have to max him out either. If Mark Cuban is prepared to go deep into the tax, something like the four-year, $80 million option we laid out above should be enough. But if Brunson wants to maximize his non-max payday, he could use the Detroit Pistons cap space to get himself a bigger deal.

Given the lack of quality free agents, but also lack of need for point guards around the NBA, Brunson should land right in the middle of “The Dinwiddie” extension and a max deal. And that’s a contract that should retain positive value as Brunson ages, while also putting him in position to sign a lucrative third contract when it expires.

 

Related NBA Contract Option Articles

The Salary Math Behind the James Harden Situation

Damian Lillards' Demands

Keith SmithFebruary 17, 2022

At the trade deadline, there’s a rush to grade trades or to decide who won or lost deals. Sometimes, this happens before all the details are even out. “The Celtics are getting Derrick White? Winners! Oh, they gave up Josh Richardson? Still Winners! Wait…a first and a potential swap too? Losers!” And then you see it play out on the floor and all of a sudden, your opinion may completely flip again.

With the benefit of a week to clear our heads, gather all the details and even see some games with new faces in new places, it’s time to start evaluating who won and lost at the trade deadline.

But…it’s not really that simple. For some of these deals, it will take months or even years to see how they fully play out. With that, there’s a pretty big caveat to all this “winners and losers” talk. This is how we judge things today, in mid-February 2022. There’s lots of room and time to be wrong. But it’s up those teams to prove us so.

All that said, here’s who won, lost and sat out the 2022 NBA trade deadline. (Note: This will encompass trades in the weeks leading up to the deadline, not just trades near or on deadline day.)

 

Winners

Atlanta Hawks

The Hawks didn’t do much. They essentially swapped Cam Reddish for Kevin Knox and a protected first-round pick. Knox has little value to Atlanta, and he’s hardly played for them, and the pick is fairly heavily-protected. The part where the Hawks won is that it removed a potentially extension negotiation from their trade of Reddish. For a team that’s already expensive and flirting with the luxury tax, that’s notable.

Boston Celtics

Boston was pretty active. They moved a couple of rotation players, plus shed enough salary to put themselves in position to avoid the luxury tax. Most importantly, the players they got back are better fits for this roster than the ones the Celtics gave up. Derrick White’s defensive versatility and skill, along with his quick-processing offensive game is a perfect fit for what Boston needs out of a backup guard. Daniel Theis is the ideal fourth-big in the rotation, because he can execute the same scheme as the other three bigs Ime Udoka uses regularly. Yes, the Celtics gave up a first-round pick and a potential pick swap. And, yes, they took on long-term money. But that long-term money gives them flexibility to match salary in almost any possible trade construction Brad Stevens can dream up moving forward.

Brooklyn Nets

We’ll get to the Philadelphia 76ers later, but this seems like it could be the most blockbustery of win-win trades in NBA history. The Nets side just may take a little longer to play out than the Sixers side. It could take Ben Simmons a while to find his form and to fit in, but, lest we forget, he’s really good at basketball! Simmons might be a non-shooter, but he’s an elite passer and the most versatile defender in the NBA. And Brooklyn is getting a couple of picks out of this deal too. Also, don’t overlook Seth Curry. He’ll feast on open jumpers created by Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving. And the more shooting around Simmons, the better.

Charlotte Hornets

We can keep this one simple. The Hornets got Montrezl Harrell for two non-rotation players. Backup center has been an issue all season long. P.J. Washington does his best, but he’s a four masquerading as a five. Harrell will give Charlotte energy and scoring off the bench, and the cost was essentially nothing.

Cleveland Cavaliers

The Cavs did well to snag Caris LeVert for Ricky Rubio’s expiring contract. They also picked up Rajon Rondo for nothing a few weeks earlier. Those are rotation-stabilizing moves for a team that is in the mix for homecourt advantage in the East. And they have LeVert for next year, while nothing prevents Cleveland from re-signing Rubio as a free agent. Good stuff all-around.

Denver Nuggets

The Nuggets got Bryn Forbes for two injured players. Considering they needed another shooter while Jamal Murray works his way back, that’s great work. But really, Murray, and potentially Michael Porter Jr., will be the big “additions” for Denver. The Nuggets are a team no higher-seeded team is going to want to see in the playoffs.

Houston Rockets

Houston got off long-term money for Daniel Theis, without taking any long-term money on. Sure, that’s an admission of guilt that they blew the Theis’ signing in the first place. But there’s no saving that by throwing good money after bad. Getting off that deal is a win for the Rockets. Now, about a John Wall buyout…

Indiana Pacers

Indiana reset themselves at the deadline as much as any team outside of Portland did. But getting back Tyrese Haliburton as a cost-controlled rookie scale guy that has All-Star potential is huge. The Pacers also got themselves a first-round pick for Caris LeVert, and they get to take a flier on Jalen Smith. But really, this is all about Haliburton, who has a chance to lead the next set of Pacers playoffs teams for years to come.

LA Clippers

The Clippers took on a good chunk of money, both this season and moving forward, but they did so for good players. Norman Powell got hurt, but that acquisition was only sort of about this year anyway. If everyone is healthy to begin next season, LA has the deepest team in the NBA and it’s not particularly close. And they’ve set themselves up with some good trade options if a third star wants to team up with Paul George and Kawhi Leonard. When your owner makes millions per second, spending his money is never a bad thing.

Milwaukee Bucks

The trade of Donte DiVincenzo looks a little rough with the hindsight of Pat Connaughton getting hurt, but as long as Connaughton is back to himself by the playoffs, all is good. Milwaukee needed another big to ease the burden on Giannis Antetokounmpo and Bobby Portis. Serge Ibaka can do that. He’s a reasonable facsimile for Brook Lopez, in that he can protect the rim on defense and space the floor on offense. And DiVincenzo likely wasn’t getting re-signed, given the presence of Connaughton and Grayson Allen already on the roster. For a team that’s trying to repeat as champs, it’s perfectly acceptable to make win-now moves like DiVincenzo for Ibaka.

New Orleans Pelicans

This one is a little tricky and you have to be bought in that C.J. McCollum has at least a few good years left. And he should. That’s probably enough to give up a first-round pick and rotation player in Josh Hart. But add in Larry Nance Jr. (if he gets healthy!) and you’ve really got something working. New Orleans has chance to be eight or nine-deep in quality rotation players at the start of next season. That’s huge for battling their way through the Western Conference. But if Zion Williamson isn’t healthy, a whole new set of questions will start being asked in the bayou.

Philadelphia 76ers

As stated above, this could be a win-win blockbuster deal. James Harden is a massive upgrade over the exactly zero the Sixers were getting from Ben Simmons. MASSIVE. That’s all that really matters here. If Harden is healthy, he and Joel Embiid can parade their way to the free throw line on a nightly basis all the way into a deep playoff run. That alone is worth giving up on Simmons (who was never playing for Philly again), Seth Curry and a couple of picks.

Phoenix Suns

Much like their terrific season to date, the Suns trade deadline moves seem to have gone a little under the radar. They got Torrey Craig for Jalen Smith, who had no future left in Phoenix. And they got Aaron Holiday for literally nothing. Craig was a nice add during last season’s NBA Finals run, and he’ll be the same this year. He’s good insurance on the wing behind Mikal Bridges and Jae Crowder. Holiday is a nice upgrade on Elfrid Payton until Cameron Payne gets back. These are winning moves at basically no cost. That’s how you get back to the Finals.

Portland Trail Blazers

The Blazers finally started the teardown. Err…umm…reset. Whatever they call it, it’s begun in Portland, and that’s a good thing. They gave it the best possible run they could with Damian Lillard and C.J. McCollum led rosters. Now, it’s time to rebuild around Lillard. The Trail Blazers opened up all sorts of cap flexibility, possibly as soon as this summer. Now, it’s about getting things right at the draft and in free agency, if they hope to keep Lillard in the only NBA home he’s ever known.

Sacramento Kings

The Kings got unfairly pilloried when news of their trade with the Indiana Pacers first broke. Sure, Tyrese Haliburton is a really good, young player. But you know what? Domantas Sabonis is also a really good, not-that-much-older player. The early returns are interesting for Sacramento. All of the offense creation doesn’t fall on De’Aaron Fox now. Sabonis is a hub through which they can run plays. He’s a two-time All-Star and that seems to have been forgotten a bit. Yes, the Kings are often the KANGZ, but this doesn’t seem to be one of those times.

San Antonio Spurs

The Spurs traded Gregg Popovich favorite Derrick White, but they got a helpful player back in Josh Richardson, along with a first-round pick and swap rights down the line. And they get a chance to see if Romeo Langford can pop, although the wing is crowded with young prospects in San Antonio. They also got a first-round pick for Thaddeus Young, which is offset a bit by giving up a nice second-round pick, but it’s still an upgrade. Overall, this is a win for the Spurs, who usually let the deadline pass with nary a peep.

 

Losers

Chicago Bulls

Usually, we won’t be too harsh on a team that sits the deadline out. But the Bulls are a legit title contender. They have a multitude of injuries, including Zach LaVine having a troublesome knee. And DeMar DeRozan is turning in a near-career-year during his age-32 season. That all screams to get someone. Yes, it would have cost them Patrick Williams and maybe Coby White. And yes, they are a little short on tradable picks. But there were deals they seemingly could have gotten in on. Standing pat could come back to bite Chicago this spring.

Dallas Mavericks

It’s understandable to want to move on from Kristaps Porzingis. He was seemingly destined to miss 30-40 games per year in Dallas. But to take back two questionable contracts in Spencer Dinwiddie and Davis Bertans offsets the shedding of Porzingis’ salary in a major way. If Dinwiddie and/or Bertans finds their previous form, we’ll eat a big helping of crow. But this doesn’t really seem like an upgrade around Luka Doncic, just as he wraps up the cheap years of his rookie scale deal.

Detroit Pistons

Putting the Pistons in the “losers” category is a little harsh. They didn’t give up anything of value in the deal to get Marvin Bagley III, but there’s no real upside there. If Bagley plays great, and finally looks something like the #2 overall pick he was in 2018, the Pistons will have no choice but to keep him and sacrifice any chance of cap space this summer. If he plays poorly, there’s nothing really lost, but there’s also nothing gained. And they didn’t deal Jerami Grant. Not making a deal is better than making a bad deal, but dragging that situation out one more trade-cycle could get a little messy for the long-term roster building.

Los Angeles Lakers

The Lakers didn’t do anything, and that in and of itself, is a loss. It might not have been the time to shed Russell Westbrook, and that should be easier to deal with this summer, but things aren’t likely to get a whole lot better with that situation. And Los Angeles shopped the Talen Horton-Tucker, Kendrick Nunn and a pick package to every team in the league. No one was buying, because there’s just not much value there. What you see is what you get for the rest of this year, minus a possible buyout addition or two.

Minnesota Timberwolves

Minnesota is another team that did nothing, but should have. They had the contracts to pile together to get in on some of the players who were traded. They also could have put together an offer for someone like Jerami Grant. Again, not making a deal is better than making a bad deal. But…the playoffs are in sight for a team that has seen the postseason once with Kevin Garnett left town. Some sort of upgrade should have been made to bolster those chances.

New York Knicks

Yes, the Knicks got Cam Reddish for a fairly minor outgoing package. But Reddish has struggled to crack Tom Thibodeau’s rotation and the coach said he’s not likely to play at all when the roster is healthy. That makes it a little hard to evaluate his fit before extension negotiations start this summer. Beyond that, the Knicks could have reset things a bit by trading away players like Alec Burks or Nerlens Noel. This season hasn’t gone how New York wanted. Not moving off some money might have been a mistake. If they don’t turn some of those contracts into better fits for next season, it definitely will have been a mistake.

Oklahoma City Thunder

The upset of the trade deadline is between the San Antonio Spurs making four trades or the Oklahoma City Thunder making just two extremely small deals to eat salary. While that’s good for the Spurs, it’s not great for the Thunder. OKC is on the tipping point of having too many draft picks. They found it impossible to move up in last year’s draft, as it was. But sitting on over $20 million cap space seems like a missed opportunity to collect more picks, or even to acquire some young talent. And the Thunder don’t project to have this sort of flexibility into this offseason.

Orlando Magic

Much like the Thunder, the Magic had a chance to be more active at the deadline. They ate a couple of small contracts, but let a large Traded Player Exception expire unused. And Orlando didn’t deal any of their veterans like Gary Harris, Terrence Ross or Robin Lopez. Not be a broken record, but not making a bad trade is more important than not making a trade. But the Magic may have missed an opportunity to collect some assets for players who aren’t likely to be a part of the next Orlando playoff team.

Toronto Raptors

It’s not that Thaddeus Young won’t help the Raptors. He might. But was that really worth sliding back 10-15 picks in the draft and giving up their best trade asset in Goran Dragic’s expiring deal? It feels like Toronto should have been able to do better than that with Dragic and a protected first-round pick. That’s what got them here as a very soft “loser”.

Utah Jazz

Much like the Bulls, the Jazz are a contender that didn’t do anything. That’s a miss. They could have gotten a piece to push them over the top. But as it stands now, Utah is firmly behind Phoenix and Golden State in the Western Conference. That’s not a great spot to be in, considering this is year umpteen of very good, but not quite great Jazz teams.

Washington Wizards

Much like the Mavericks, the Wizards sort of shuffled things around in picking up Kristaps Porzingis in exchange for Spencer Dinwiddie and Davis Bertans. Maybe Porzingis will pop and finally stay healthy, but history says he won’t. And that means his deal will be a cap albatross for Washington for a couple more seasons. It’s also easier to move a couple of smaller contracts vs one big one. This could go really poorly for the Wizards.

 

Sat-it-out

Golden State Warriors

The Warriors didn’t have much to do. They are playing well and their roster is fairly set. Their best trade assets are their recent draftees and all are too young, too good or both, to trade now. It’s likely this roster is what it is, minus some hopefully better health down the stretch.

Memphis Grizzlies

The Grizzlies are way ahead of schedule. This young team is brash, scrappy and fun. They’re also very good. Maybe Memphis could have moved a couple of their expiring deals, but they had no real roster holes to fill. They’ll use this playoff run to determine what they need to take the next step from fun playoff team to title contender.

Miami Heat

The Heat largely sat out the deadline. They made one small, salary-clearing deal. That opened up a roster spot and some space under the tax. Miami converted Caleb Martin to a standard deal, after he outplayed his Two-Way deal. Now, the Heat will look to add another veteran on the buyout market.

 

Keith SmithFebruary 15, 2022

The 2022 NBA trade deadline is now behind us. There were 10 trades made on deadline day alone, and 16 total trades made during deadline week. These deals ranged from the blockbuster James Harden-for-Ben Simmons swap to small salary-clearing trades for teams looking to dodge the luxury tax.

Now that the deadline has passed, we have a better idea of what this offseason landscape might look like.

In general, teams slot into one of three categories in the offseason. There are Cap Space teams, Non-Taxpayer Mid-Level teams (can use the full $10.2 million MLE) and Taxpayer Mid-Level teams (can use the “mini” $6.3 million MLE).

Here’s where each team stands after the trade deadline:

 

Cap Space Teams

  1. Detroit Pistons - $31.4 million
  2. Orlando Magic - $28.1 million
  3. Indiana Pacers - $23.8 million
  4. Portland Trail Blazers - $20.0 million
  5. San Antonio Spurs - $17.6 million

These five teams are all in line to have cap space this summer. Detroit and Orlando seem like locks to go the cap space route. Barring something unexpected with their own free agents, or with trades before the deadline, these three will be in position to do the spending in the offseason. The only major changes that could come to this projection is if either team decides to hang on to former high draft picks, Marvin Bagley III or Mo Bamba.

Indiana and Portland could both choose to stay over the cap via keeping free agent rights and or trade exceptions. Both made considerable changes leading up to the deadline and more big changes are likely to come this season. Neither team has said they are rebuilding, but rather “resetting” around some of the players they kept after making several trades.

The Spurs took on some money at the deadline by acquiring Romeo Langford and Josh Richardson, and by acquiring two additional first-round picks. That takes their projection to under $20 million. If San Antonio was to move on from restricted free Lonnie Walker IV, they could push the Pistons for the most space this summer.

 

Non-Taxpayer Mid-Level Teams

  1. Cleveland Cavaliers
  2. Houston Rockets
  3. Memphis Grizzlies
  4. Minnesota Timberwolves
  5. New York Knicks
  6. Oklahoma City Thunder
  7. Sacramento Kings
  8. Toronto Raptors
  9. Washington Wizards

This group of eight teams is a mixed bag. Teams like Cleveland, Memphis, Minnesota and Toronto have their cores locked in. They’ll be looking to use the $10.3 million Non-Taxpayer MLE to supplement that group.

After salary-dumping Daniel Theis at the deadline, the Houston Rockets are now in range of being able to use the full MLE this offseason. They’ll likely split it, as the Rockets are still more than one MLE addition away from competing for the playoffs.

New York is a bit harder to project. They could be a team that makes a major pivot after a disappointing season following their 2021 playoff appearance. Look for whatever the Knicks to do to come via trade vs clearing enough salary to get in the cap space derby.

Some may be surprised to find Oklahoma City in this group. The Thunder have a major contract extension kicking in for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander next season, plus they project to have three first-round draft picks. That’s got them over the cap, despite still being early in their rebuild. OKC will continue to build through the draft and through trades and may just sit on the MLE for now.

Then you have the factories of sadness that are Sacramento and Washington. Both have All-Star level players. Both have solid role players. Yet, it never quite seems to come together for either franchise. In an offseason that will feature yet another retooling, these teams will spend the MLE on a player or players they hope will push them firmly into the playoff picture.

 

Taxpayer Mid-Level Teams

This group is so big we’re going to sub-divide them. The two categories will be “Close to the Tax” and “Over the Tax”

Close to the Tax

  1. Charlotte Hornets
  2. Chicago Bulls
  3. New Orleans Pelicans

These three teams will be dancing around the tax line. Charlotte (Miles Bridges) and Chicago (Zach LaVine) have free agents to re-sign who are going to eat up most of their room under the tax line.

New Orleans is probably a move away from joining the teams who can use the full MLE and stay under the tax. They have 13 players under contract and are only one small salary-shedding deal from opening up full MLE space.

Over the Tax

  1. Atlanta Hawks
  2. Boston Celtics
  3. Brooklyn Nets
  4. Dallas Mavericks
  5. Denver Nuggets
  6. Golden State Warriors
  7. LA Clippers
  8. Los Angeles Lakers
  9. Miami Heat
  10. Milwaukee Bucks
  11. Philadelphia 76ers
  12. Phoenix Suns
  13. Utah Jazz

This is potentially the largest group of tax-paying teams the NBA will have ever seen. It may not end up playing out this way, as some may shed salary or make free agent decisions that allow them to duck the tax. But as it stands, all 13 of these teams are currently over the tax, or project to be after they fill out their rosters for the 2022-23 season. That’ll have them limited to spending the $6.3 million Taxpayer MLE for help, or upgrading their rosters via trades. Since all fancy themselves as somewhere between solid playoff teams and title contenders, don’t expect to see a lot of salary-shedding from within this group.

 

Related NBA Links

NBA Cap Tracker

NBA Tax Tracker

Keith SmithFebruary 09, 2022

The 2022 NBA trade deadline is closing in. We’ve already seen several big trades, including the Indiana Pacers and Portland Trail Blazers kicking off major resets. On the other side, the New Orleans Pelicans and Sacramento Kings have made moves that should help them now and in the future.

There’s likely more moves to come. Ben Simmons for James Harden, anyone? But the summer of 2022 landscape is already coming into focus for cap space as we approach the deadline.

In general, teams slot into one of three categories in the offseason. There are Cap Space teams, Non-Taxpayer Mid-Level teams (can use the full $10.2 million MLE) and Taxpayer Mid-Level teams (can use the “mini” $6.3 million MLE).

Here’s where each team stands before the trade deadline passes at 3:00 Pm ET on Thursday:

 

Cap Space Teams

  1. Detroit Pistons - $31.4 million
  2. Orlando Magic - $28.1 million
  3. San Antonio Spurs - $22.5 million
  4. Indiana Pacers - $20.8 million
  5. Portland Trail Blazers – $20.3 million

These five teams are all in line to have cap space this summer. Detroit, Orlando and San Antonio all seem like locks to go the cap space route. Barring something unexpected with their own free agents, or with trades before the deadline, these three will be in position to do the spending in the offseason.

Indiana and Portland could both choose to stay over the cap via keeping free agent rights and or trade exceptions. It’s not really clear if either is done dealing before the deadline either. Further moves could change this projection by a considerable amount.

 

Non-Taxpayer Mid-Level Teams

  1. Cleveland Cavaliers
  2. Memphis Grizzlies
  3. Minnesota Timberwolves
  4. New York Knicks
  5. Oklahoma City Thunder
  6. Sacramento Kings
  7. Toronto Raptors
  8. Washington Wizards

This group of eight teams is a mixed bag. Teams like Cleveland, Memphis, Minnesota and Toronto have their cores locked in. They’ll be looking to use the $10.3 million Non-Taxpayer MLE to supplement that group.

New York is a bit harder to project. They could be a team that makes a major pivot after a disappointing season following their 2021 playoff appearance. Look for whatever the Knicks to do to come via trade vs clearing enough salary to get in the cap space derby.

Some may be surprised to find Oklahoma City in this group. The Thunder have a major contract extension kicking in for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander next season, plus they project to have three first-round draft picks. That’s got them over the cap, despite still being early in their rebuild. OKC will continue to build through the draft and through trades and may just sit on the MLE for now.

Then you have the factories of sadness that are Sacramento and Washington. Both have All-Star level players. Both have solid role players. Yet, it never quite seems to come together for either franchise. In an offseason that will feature yet another retooling, these teams will spend the MLE on a player or players they hope will push them firmly into the playoff picture.

 

Taxpayer Mid-Level Teams

This group is so big we’re going to sub-divide them. The two categories will be “Close to the Tax” and “Over the Tax”

Close to the Tax

  1. Charlotte Hornets
  2. Chicago Bulls
  3. Houston Rockets
  4. New Orleans Pelicans

These four teams will be dancing around the tax line. Charlotte (Miles Bridges) and Chicago (Zach LaVine) have free agents to re-sign who are going to eat up most of their room under the tax line.

Houston is still carrying John Wall’s sizable contract, which has them tighter to the tax than they would like.

New Orleans is probably a move away from joining the teams who can use the full MLE and stay under the tax. They have 13 players under contract and are only one small salary-shedding deal from opening up full MLE space.

Over the Tax

  1. Atlanta Hawks
  2. Boston Celtics
  3. Brooklyn Nets
  4. Dallas Mavericks
  5. Denver Nuggets
  6. Golden State Warriors
  7. LA Clippers
  8. Los Angeles Lakers
  9. Miami Heat
  10. Milwaukee Bucks
  11. Philadelphia 76ers
  12. Phoenix Suns
  13. Utah Jazz

This is potentially the largest group of tax-paying teams the NBA will have ever seen. It may not end up playing out this way, as some may shed salary or make free agent decisions that allow them to duck the tax. But as it stands, all 13 of these teams are currently over the tax, or project to be after they fill out their rosters for the 2022-23 season. That’ll have them limited to spending the $6.3 million Taxpayer MLE for help, or upgrading their rosters via trades. Since all fancy themselves as somewhere between solid playoff teams and title contenders, don’t expect to see a lot of salary-shedding from within this group.

 

Related NBA Links

NBA Cap Tracker

NBA Tax Tracker

Keith SmithFebruary 09, 2022

Multiple NBA teams aren’t waiting for the trade deadline to get close to make their moves. The Indiana Pacers and Portland Trail Blazers have already made major moves that have altered the future for their franchises. A few others will join them before Thursday’s deadline.

Then, almost as soon as the buzzer sounds at 3:00 PM ET on Thursday, teams will shift towards “buyout season”. Players who are currently on NBA rosters must be waived by 5:00 PM ET on Tuesday, March 1 in order to be eligible to play in the 2022 playoffs. (Note: Waived by that date. Not signed by March 1.) That leaves a period of two-and-a-half weeks for players to work buyout agreements before catching on for a playoff run.

Here’s a list of players to keep an eye that might reach a buyout agreement after the trade deadline.

 

D.J. Augustin – Houston Rockets

Augustin recently said he doesn’t want to leave Houston. He’s a Texas-native and is enjoying being home. But contenders are often looking for veteran point guard help. If Augustin can catch on with a contender and chase a title in his 14th season, that draw may be enough for a buyout.

 

Eric Bledsoe – Portland Trail Blazers

The Blazers acquired Bledsoe as part of the overhaul of their roster. But Bledsoe was acquired more for future cap flexibility than his skills as a player. Portland is expected to eat the $3.9 million Bledsoe is guaranteed for 2022-23, if they keep Bledsoe this season or not. If they can get that number down via a buyout, look for Bledsoe to hit the open market in the coming weeks.

 

Goran Dragic – Toronto Raptors

Toronto is trying to package Dragic and a draft pick in a trade to upgrade their depth. The Raptors are looking for a center, but are open to any deal that pushes them forward this season and in the future. Given Dragic has as $19.4 million expiring deal, which is an attractive trade chip for a team looking to shed some salary. If no trade is made, Dragic will probably be one of the first players bought out after Thursday’s trade deadline.

 

Serge Ibaka – LA Clippers

Ibaka is in a bit of a weird place. The Clippers certainly aren’t trying to lower their luxury tax bill, as witnessed by taking on significant salary in the Normal Powell and Robert Covington trade. LA is also a lock to be at least in the Play-In tournament. But Ibaka’s role has been in flux all season, as he’s dealt with a back injury. If the Clippers feel it’s best to move forward with Ivica Zubac and Isaiah Hartenstein at center, they could buy out the remainder of Ibaka’s expiring $9.7 million deal.

 

Jeremy Lamb – Sacramento Kings

It’s unclear what the Kings plans are for Lamb, after acquiring the veteran guard in the Domantas Sabonis-Tyrese Haliburton trade. They could use the guard depth, after trading away Haliburton and Buddy Hield. Sacramento is also not giving up on pushing for a Play-In spot. If they feel Lamb can help in that pursuit, they’ll keep him. If not, they could work a buyout of Lamb’s expiring $10.5 million contract and let him free to join a playoff team.

 

Robin Lopez – Orlando Magic

This one is a bit of a weird situation. Lopez has no desire to leave Orlando, and the Magic aren’t shopping him. But Lopez is playing out a one-year, $5 million contract, so he’s eminently tradable. It’s unclear what the plan here is, but Lopez would be an upgrade for teams looking for a backup big, via trade or buyout.

 

Paul Millsap – Brooklyn Nets

The Nets have already let Millsap know they are open to trading him to a team where he can play a bigger role. If that doesn’t happen, Brooklyn will eat the one-year, veteran minimum deal and will set Millsap free to join a team of his choosing.

 

Tomas Satoransky – Portland Trail Blazers

Like Eric Bledsoe, Satoransky was acquired during Portland’s trade deadline makeover. The Blazers are now flush with guards and don’t have a need for the veteran. Because he’s on an expiring $10 million deal, look for Satoransky to take a buyout and to join a contender.

 

Tristan Thompson – Indiana Pacers

The Pacers acquired Thompson as a part of the big Domantas Sabonis-Tyrese Haliburton swap with the Sacramento Kings. Indiana’s season is going nowhere and they’ll give their center minutes to Goga Bitadze and Isaiah Jackson until Myles Turner returns. Look for Thompson to reach a buyout agreement on his $9.7 million expiring contract. That will allow him to catch on with a contender looking for center depth.

 

John Wall – Houston Rockets

Wall is the only player on this list with real money remaining beyond this season. That’s the complicating factor in both trade and buyout discussions for Wall. He’s owed $91.7 million through 2022-23. There’s not likely to be a trade coming, given the size of his deal, and Wall has said he’s not inclined to give money up in a buyout. But at his age, let’s see if the trade deadline passes and Wall changes his mind. That’s exactly what played out with Blake Griffin last season, but that also involved over $16 million less in salary to buy out.

 

Thaddeus Young – San Antonio Spurs

The Spurs already made one in-season trade, which fulfills their internal quota for the next half-decade or so. But if San Antonio wants to make another deal before the deadline, they should be able to find a home for Young. The veteran big man has been somewhat in demand for contenders looking for frontcourt depth. One challenge in a trade is that the Spurs won’t take on any long-term salary. That could leave Young left to reach agreement on a buyout, which San Antonio is definitely amenable to.

 

Los Angeles Lakers

This one is a catch-all, because the Lakers are fully expected to free up some roster spots via trades or waivers. Despite scuffling along under .500, Los Angeles knows veterans will sign on to attempt a playoff run with LeBron James and Anthony Davis. This won’t be a major buyout (no Russell Westbrook won’t get bought out), but more of a retooling at the backend of the roster. DeAndre Jordan, Kent Bazemore and possibly Wayne Ellington could all be casualties of the Lakers churning their final few roster spots.

Top